Emil Čić,
hrvatski novinar,
glazbenik i publicist
'križarski amblem' Emila Čića Croatia  in Christ
Summary of
A History of Croatian Enemies

by Emil Čić

ISBN 953-98968-0-0
© Emil ČIĆ

A Philosophy of History –:

"The History of Croatian Enemies"
A history of enemy ideologies,
and political performances of the ideas

Chapter 4


How Yugoslavia was created


In 2001, Mr. Ljudevit Krmpotić, Ph.D. made an important contribution to historical research when he translated "Illyrian Letters" into Croatian, a book written by the British spy, archeologist and adventurer Arthur John Evans (1851-1941), and added significant comment.  Evans traveled through the countries of the future Yugoslavia from 1875 and his pro-Serbian travelogue with political undertones was published by the "Manchester Guardian" newspaper (from 8th of February 1877 onwards).  The "Illyrian Letters" are interesting because they are yet another proof that Englishmen planned and founded Yugoslavia. Evans reports: "quiet forces are acting on the foundation of the South Slav communion", and it aims at the "…isolation of Croats and their artificial nationality!"…[1] (Translation back into English)

In a letter dated 1st December 1883, British Prime Minister Gladstone refers to a discussion between Elliot, a politician and the Austrian Ambassador Kalnoky on the possible creation of socialist republics on the Austrian borders.  This indicates that the British had investigated possible reactions to political developments around Austria in times very distant from that, which we now know as a period of the communist socialist republics. Evans expectation of the creation of (socialist) Yugoslavia was fulfilled by his successor R.W. Seton-Watson (1879–1951), who supported communist paratroopers during WW II, thus helping to create the "socialist republics".

If we evaluate how the history of the region unfolded, we can easily arrive at a thesis, from the book "Illyrian Letters", that the British had conceived this plan hundreds of years earlier. In correspondence between the Yugoslav ideologist bishop Juraj Strossmayer and British Prime Minister Gladstone (letters from 11th April 1878, and 12th October 1882), Strossmayer expressed his hopes for the salvation of an Austrian state as a force for political balance between the Germans and Slavs. To Gladstone, he also recommended a promotion of the Yugoslav idea by European Freemasonry (which Strossmayer had already officially attacked in his Catholic epistles!).

Throughout the book it is evident that Evans saw the Serbs to be the greatest hope of British political expectations. Serbs indeed realized such British hope: Croats experienced it.



American "New World Order"

As an English Neocolonial Enslavement of the World



On the 14th December 1999, the Zagreb publishing house "Antun Gustav Matoš", organized a conference entitled "The Forum of the Zagreb City" at 27, Kaptol Square, to introduce "The century of War". This book, published for the first time in Germany in 1992, is one of the most important history books of 20th century on the aims and methods of Anglo-American imperialism. Speakers included the author William F. Engdahl, together with journalists Mirjana Rakić, and Željko Krušelj and historian Antun Abramović (a reviewer of the Emil Čić's "A History of Croatian Enemies")

The book points to the fact that the British Establishment, in furthering British colonial interests, constantly produced wars in the 20th century.  The first and the second WW's were the result of British political perfidy and Adolf Hitler's rise to power (with the British assistance!) gave the British good reason to wage a war that would, they hoped, serve as the final destruction of Germany, and secure British predomination in the world.  In the context of such British policy, there were important reasons for the creation of a British Yugoslavia.

Three axes of the British Empire were/are oil, the banking system and the seaways to her colonies.  These were endangered by German industrial capability. By 1896 Germany had opened a railway line from Berlin to Konia village, in the depths of Turkey. For the first time the railway created a direct traffic link to Baghdad and Kuwait. However, from a British point of view this was no reason to be happy. R. G. D. Laffan, a British military adviser to the Serbian Army (before WW I), warned British politicians that the Berlin-Baghdad rail project would result in a unified continental area under German control. [2] This could endanger British naval predominance with consequential loss of wealth and influence. For Laffan, Serbia was a front line of defence for the British colonies.  If Serbia were to be incorporated into the Berlin-Baghdad project then the weak links to British Colonies would greatly benefit from the strong impact of German penetration to the East!  For that reasons Serbia got a central role in the destruction of the Austrian Empire and subsequent creation of Yugoslavia. Croats were subject to a Serbian dominated political state, with its terrorizing machinery, aimed at hindering German penetration to the East over the Croatian coastal and continental area.

According to Engdahl, in 1973, American masters of oil politics organized a business meeting in the city of Saltsjoebaden, Sweden. Present in this  "Bilderberg group" (that existed from the time of their meeting in Germany in 1954), was Robert D. Murphy, a man who in 1922 planned and recommended "project Hitler" (and then planned the Anglo American government of the world together with the Americans). In 1944, he projected American politics in Germany and later, from the office of the Military advisor in Germany, co-governed Germany from 1945 till 1949.

For Croats this meant that the British supported the same strategic politics with the Serbs and Yugoslavia (with the rest of Croatian enemies) with the resultant continuous destructive impact on Croatian freedom.  Today, the same planners think in the same way and support similar legislators who think like them. History has taken the same direction. Therefore, it would be foolhardy of any nation to ignore such facts.


The Beginning of The Third Millennium

In The Light of the Thought of Blessed Cardinal Alojzije Stepinac (1898 – 1960)


At the end of my article in the Croatian Literary Review "MARULIĆ" 1994/ No. 05, on a series of thoughts by Blessed Cardinal Alojzije Stepinac, I quoted the following extract from his diary dated 5th November 1940 (printed in the weekly "Danas": Zagreb, on 7th August, 1990). "The world is bound for its destruction, indeed, unless God saves it with his mighty hand by miraculous means. If Germany happens to win the war, there will be terrible terror and ruin for small nations. If England wins the war, the Freemasons, the Jews, that is to say immorality and corruption will stay in power in our countries. If the USSR wins the war, then Satan and hell will have gained power over the world. Therefore, where shall we raise our eyes but to Thee, oh Lord?..."  Prophetic words, indeed, as history later recorded.

Hitler's Germany spread horrible terror, and after the Independent State of Croatia had been ruined, the Communist devil and hell won the war: The fight for an independent state by the majority of Croats (more than two thirds of the population) was branded as "Fascism", and between 1941 and 1950 the Communists/ "Antifascists", with special assistance from the English, massacred about half a million Croats (at the Austrian city of Bleiburg in May 1945). In order to deflect attention from that crime, they invented the Jasenovac (concentration camp) myth that 700,000 Serbs and Jews were killed there.  In "Večernji list" ("The Evening News") of 6th January 2001 we read: "...At the Croatian State Archives there are always some new documents about the Jasenovac victims being found. (...) According to the 1946 census, in the People's Republic of Croatia there were about 159,193 persons altogether killed and missing throughout the war. The Union of the Fighters (Communist veterans) claimed that this number was inaccurate, and so a new census was organized and repeated four years later. Judging from reports, it was first assumed that there were some 300,000 victims, divided according to the kind of suffering, nationality, sex and profession. The final report, according to Croatian historian Mate Rupić (at the meeting of Croatian and Serbian historians in Pechuh, Hungary, 2000), established the fact that there had been about 155,142 to 156,226 victims. A difference of about one thousand people (sic!) was brought about by the lack of coordination of statistical methods. (...) However, in order to establish the real truth about the Jasenovac concentration camp, it is necessary to know that the census of 1950 estimated 34,711 people to have been killed at the concentration camps in Croatia. This census embraced not only the concentration camps in Croatia, but also those (Croatian citizens) out of Croatia, including Italy and the Third Reich…."

            What then was the Second World War experience for Croats?  A subjugation imposed by British Freemasons, who supported the atheistic Communist partisans, who fought against the Catholic believers, with a victory granted by the British: against the Domobrans and Ustasha fighters who were declared to be Fascists, in spite of the fact that their ideology was not Fascist: their ideology was founded on the Peasant Party (20th century) of Stjepan Radić and on the Party of The Croatian State Right ideology by Ante Starčević (19th century). For the first time in the history of Croatia as antemurale christianitatis (the title given by the Pope), Croatian crusaders were defeated by godless persons and Satanists who defamed a lot of innocent victims. Not only had English Freemasons gained power over the world, but the darkest Balkanic primitivism spread all over Croatia too. Until 1945, Croatia was firmly anchored in Europe and from 1945 onwards, for the first time in its history, Croatia fell under the Balkans: all mechanisms of defence were destroyed. The Serbian announcement: "Struggle to extermination, ours or yours!" by Nikola Stojanović, a young Bosnian Serb, which appeared so impudently and shamelessly in the "Srpski književni glasnik", published by Serbs in the Croatian capital of Zagreb in 1902, was thus put into action. However, the Croatian people survived the greatest disaster and tragedy in their history. After the ruin of the Independent State of Croatia, the nation did not even have a right to be associated with the defeated peoples and states: the Croatian legal Army was executed in captivity, and the state was destroyed and given as a present to the Serbs and their Croatian Communist servants who never ceased to repeat: "We cannot live without Serbs, and they cannot live without us. Who are we without Serbs and who are Serbs without us?"

Once again, it was Blessed Cardinal Stepinac who testified that the Croatian people had lost their liberty: "...We demand the absolute freedom of the Catholic press, the absolute freedom of Catholic schools in all the classes in primary and secondary schools (...), the absolute freedom of the human personality and his inalienable rights...." (A Pastoral Letter on 20th September 1945). With the loss of their freedom, the Croats lost their entire culture: beginning with the imposition of Western Balkans ideology instead of that of "Mitteleuropa", Central Europe!  If the English - and the Freemasons, opponents of the Catholic Church and Catholicism, - won the battle what could Croats expect but the denial of the right to their own culture and state, which grew from the ground of Christian belief? Ever since 1918, when the British created the state of Yugoslavia as defence against the Catholic Austro-Hungarian Empire and the German "Drang nach Osten" all the way to Baghdad and India, the Croats have been in the same position: as Catholics relying on Rome, the Croats have been disturbing modern Freemasonry, which relies on the Serbs. Ever since the time of Napoleon's Illyrian provinces, Freemasonry has been spreading all over Croatia, and even further. As a geopolitical unity, Croatia (as a free state) gravitates towards Italy and Germany, which to British interests means cutting off a line of survivability to the British Empire (transformed into a Commonwealth of colonised "free nations."). This then is the main reason why it is necessary to erase Croatia from the geographic map. Regarding the Hague Court of Injustice, Croats should not be surprised: it is actually part of the mechanism for the total destruction of Croatia and its moral right to be an independent state.  Just consider this fact: who are the most important "witnesses" against Croatia at the Hague Court? Once again, it is the British, their military officers (whom Croatians regard with justified suspicion as acting in favour of the conflict between Croats and Muslims and who perpetrated the massacre in Ahmici, Bosnia/Herzegovina), and an English politician Paddy Ashdown, the leader of the Liberal Party!

In a lot of articles by Dr. Milan Šufflay (1879-1931) - a famous scholar in his day - it is easy to find a leitmotiv for the central thesis about British predominance in the world and reasons for British political behaviour. Šufflay outlined the contents and quoted from the book "The Day of The Saxons", written by Homer Lea and published in London in 1912. In this book, called by Šufflay 'the New Testament of the British world politics', there are two striking axioms: "...The first, is that anything that happens in any part of the world directly influences Great Britain. The second, is that the loss of India, after the loss of the British Isles, would be the greatest blow for the Empire..." So wrote Šufflay in his article "The British Empire" (p. 219, Dr. Milan Šufflay, Selected Essays, Vol. 2, Publications of Darko Sagrak, Zagreb 2000). In further texts, it becomes clear why the eyes of the Serbs are always turned in the direction of London, towards the creators of Yugoslavia (as described in Šufflay's article "Over The Abyss of The Two Worlds", published in "Hrvatsko pravo" on 29th June, 1929). In this article Šufflay was the first to point his finger at the real creators of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, namely the Englishmen Wickham Steed and Seton Watson, (Šufflay, Selected Essays, Vol. 1, Zagreb 1999).

Throughout the 20th century Croatia has been, we may say, a real victim of Satan and of the greatest evil that could befall it: if ever injustice so strongly and completely triumphed over Croatia, it happened precisely in the 20th century. The Communists succeeded in educating legions of janissaries, brainwashed heads, so-called independent Croatian intellectuals who loyally spat on the notions of national identity. [3] Geographically, the enemy cut Croatian Syrmium with the ethnically Croatian city of Zemun. The historically Croatian province of Bosnia was ethnically cleansed from Croatian inhabitants and Serbs and Communists exterminated the old Bosnian Muslim aristocracy, conscious of their Croatian origin and Croatian statehood.  In the remaining parts of Croatia, enemies corrupted the media in order to spit slavishly on aspirations for independence and finally, when General Blaškić was condemned by The Hague Court, contrary to God's justice, we did not hear a unanimous and clear condemnation of that legal crime from leaders of the Catholic Church. Therefore, resembling the prophets of the Old Testament, we must cry out: "Alas, O Israel, for today you abandoned so many just persons - tomorrow you will deny Christ".

Therefore, where shall we raise our eyes but to Thee, oh Lord? - said Blessed Cardinal Stepinac. [4]





"The Anglo-American Establishment"

The untold story of the Anglo-American ruling of the World




The world's books and journals are full of titles, which speak of the new Anglo-American imperialism called "The New World Order".  In Croatia some articles explain the background to the forces behind such ideology. Marinko Bobanovich, in his article "Virtual liberty" ("Vjesnik", 2nd February 1997) recounted the story of British journalist Mark Fisher, published in the journal "Index of Censorship" and on the web in 1997. The article reveals that Britain exercises total control of information in their area despite laws that guarantee freedom of information. According to European Court of Justice records from Strasbourg, human rights are violated to such an extent in Britain that there is no comparable example in Europe "(…) and among 26 member-countries, Britain alone has no law on human rights." Journalist Maja Freundlich published an article "Colonies, the Rulers of the World and New Colonies" (8th February 1998) in which she quotes from Noam Chomsky's book "A Rich Minority and Unrest Majority" (1992/93). The quotes give us the complete picture.  According to Maja (Maya) Freundlich, at a meeting with British Premier Tony Blair on Friday 6th February 1998, USA President Clinton said, "Our two nations must continue to collaborate in ruling the world".In 2001, his successor, President Bush Jr., confirmed the "special relations" of USA and Britain.  But the "special relations" referred to neo-colonial plans under the outside illusive mask of the liberation and democratisation of the world. Chomsky quoted a secret political paper by George Kennan U.S. minister of Foreign Affairs (in 1948) who wrote "We possess some 50% of the world's riches and just 6.3% of the world population.  Our real aim is to impose the relations that will make it possible to keep such an imbalance…" We find a similar opinion in Chomsky's book "World Orders Old and New": "For the former colonies, the principles of global planning entailed that "ultra nationalist" tendencies must be suppressed. U.S. interests were seen to be threatened by "radical and nationalistic regimes" that are responsive to popular pressures for "immediate improvement in the low living standards of the masses" and development for domestic needs. The reasons are clear: such tendencies conflict with the need for "a political and economic climate conducive to private investment" with adequate repatriation of profits (NSC 5432/1, 1954), and the need for "protection of our raw materials" (Kennan). In a comprehensive secret policy review in 1948, Kennan cautioned that "we should cease to talk about vague and ... unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of the living standards, and democratisation" we must "deal in straight power concepts," not "hampered by idealistic slogans" about "altruism and world-benefaction," if we are to maintain the "position of disparity" that separates our enormous wealth from the poverty of others" [5]

It is clear from the rest of the article that for the New World Order, the most dangerous enemies are nationalists and nationalist ideology.  Only patriots would resist plans which attempt to realize a new enslavement and imbalance of property.

In the Austrian journal "Spectrum" (14th March 1998) an article "War on the Screen" by Jakob Steuerer described how totalitarian methods rule information and the world.  He reports that phone calls, e-mails and faxes are redirected to the strategic centre in London after which they are sent via satellite to "Fort Meade" in Maryland, USA.  The article quoted from a report by Steve Right for the European Union.

Under such circumstances an Anglo-American Establishment of this nature traditionally means disrespect for the Croatian state, rights and economic stability, because Anglo-Americans have always insisted on their old geopolitical aims and plans, traditionally harmful for Croatia.



"The Anglo-American Establishment"

by Carroll Quigley

"The Anglo-American Establishment", [6] a book by Carroll Quigley (1910-1977) excavates the roots of British-American technology for ruling the world.  In the second half of the nineteenth century, 1891, according to Quigley, Lord Cecil Rhodes (1853-1902) and Lord Alfred Milner (who died in 1925) founded a Secret Society (later known as the Milner Group) with the aim of preserving the future of the British Empire.  In 1877, Rhodes conceived, in his first will, the purpose of his Secret Society.

  • The extension of British rule throughout the world…
  • Colonization by British subjects of all lands…
  • The ultimate recovery of the U.S.A. as an integral part of the British Empire…
  • The foundation of so great a power as to hereafter render wars impossible and promote the best interests of humanity…

After 1889, Cecil and Rhodes acted in the form of Imperial Federalists.  The first founders and ideological inspirers were William T. Stead (1849-1912), a famous British journalist of his period and Reginald Balliol Brett, later Lord Esher, a friend and advisor of Queen Victoria.  Their methods "can be summed up under three headings: (a) a triple-front penetration in politics, education and journalism: (b) the recruitment of men of ability (chiefly from All Souls, Oxford) and the linking of these men to the Cecil Bloc by matrimonial alliances and by gratitude for titles and positions of power and (c) the influencing of public policy by placing members of the Cecil Bloc in positions shielded as much as possible from public attention…" [7] In short: to perform such a plan they were divided into the "Society of the Elect" and "The Association of Helpers". During the first half of the 20th century the Society controlled the most influential journal of high society: "The Times" (in 1922 completely); important positions in some other influential journals and the most important political positions in Britain and the U.S.A. Oxford University had become their recruiting centre for future British aristocracy of Imperial spirit and the Rhodes Scholarships were founded with the aim of supporting this project.

            The Secret Society was patterned on the Jesuits.  In a letter to the trustee of his third will, Rhodes instructed how the society was to be formed, saying: "In considering questions suggested take Constitution of the Jesuits if obtainable and insert 'English Empire' for 'Roman Catholic Religion'…" [8] A member of the group H. A. L. Fisher (1865-1940) explained their new religion in a book "Our New Religion" (1929), dealing with "Christian Science."  "In connection with this last book, it might be mentioned that Christian Science became the religion of the "Milner Group", [9] and the information indicates that members of the group belonged to the sect of Freemasonic illuminati. Antony Sutton in his book "American Secret Establishment" said that the Freemasonic order of "Skull and Bones", to whom ex-U.S.A. President George Bush Snr. belongs, is a part of the Round Table founded by Cecil Rhodes and related to illuminati /Freemasons.  So, what can we now expect from his son Bush Jnr.?

            The story of the Secret British Society is very important information as it explains a lot of things. We believed that the British Empire was dissolved with the foundation of the Commonwealth of Nations, but the story of the Milner group and the secret society reveals that the aim in fact was to transform the Empire into the Commonwealth! As Quigley explains, their aim was to control ex-colonial countries by a system of Round Table groups worldwide, [10] and to found the League of Nations (later the United Nations), which would be a manipulative part of the Secret Society.  The father of the Commonwealth idea was a member of the Milner Group.  His name was Lionel Curtis (1872-1955).  In 1916, he published a book entitled "The Commonwealth of Nations". As Quigley says "Reluctantly, Curtis and others postponed the idea of a federated Empire and fell back on the idea of trying to hold the Empire together by the intangible bonds of common culture and common outlook.  This had (in Rhodes and Milner) been a supplement to the project of a larger world federation. (…) At the same time the idea of federation was swallowed up in a larger scheme for the organisation of the whole world in a League of Nations." [11]

            Such development of British (-American) secret 'Round Table-political ideas' gives us a general paradigm of the real British strategic goals: complete predominance in the world and always with the same goals. For Croatia this means that the explanations given by Croatian ideologist Milan von Sufflay on the British creation of Yugoslavia have a very important significance: their strategic relations did not change.  The British (Americans) will be determined to control or destroy Croatia.    




The Founder of Yugoslavia William Seton-Watson

And the politics of the Milner Group in Europe


If you ever find and completely read the book "Anglo-American Establishment" (from Rhodes to Cliveden), you will not find any mention of the word "Yugoslavia" except in the last footnote. Croatia is not mentioned at all. The active creator of Yugoslavia, Scotsman William Seton-Watson, (1879-1951) appears briefly on page 186. He is mentioned as a member of a scientific symposium of the "Royal Institute of International Affairs," Chatham House, organised by the Milner Group in the period 1933 – 1934.  Other speakers during the same period included Ormsby-Gore, Oliver Lyttelton, Edward Grigg, Donald Somervell, Toynbee, Zimmern, R.W. Seton-Watson and Lord Lothian: the majority of whom were the most important representatives of the Milner Group at the time.  This was the same period during which Hitler came to power, with British help.  On p.273, of his book "The Anglo American Establishment", Quigley gives a direct explanation of the importance of Yugoslavia for the Milner Group and the objectives of Seton-Watson: "The countries marked for liquidation (by Hitler's intervention) included Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland, but did not include Greece and Turkey since the Group had no intention of allowing Germany to get down to the Mediterranean "lifeline".  Indeed the purpose of the Hoare-Laval plan of 1935, which wrecked the collective-security system by seeking to give most of Ethiopia to Italy, was intended to bring an appeased Italy into position alongside England, in order to block any movement of Germany southward rather than eastward.  The plan failed because Mussolini decided that he could get more out of England by threats from the side of Germany that from cooperation at the side of England"… This meant that for the British the creation and survival of the then Yugoslavia was of the greatest importance. The German expansion took place according to a Milner Group plan, which intended to push Germany into the world war, which Germany would be held completely responsible for planning and provoking.  For the British group, Yugoslavia was also on the way "…down onto the Mediterranean 'lifeline'…"!!! They planned to have Mussolini's Italy as an ally.

As has been already said, the words "Yugoslavia" or "Croatia" (as a part of Yugoslavia) appear nowhere in the book except in footnote 3 on p. 335 in Quigley's comment that "the last public act of the Milner Group was the drawing of the Italo-Yugoslav boundary in 1946.  The British Delegate on the Boundary Commission was C.H. Waldock, now a Chichele Professor and Fellow of All Souls, assisted by R.J. Stopford…" Furthermore, the a book entitled "Seton-Watson and the Yugoslavs, Correspondence 1906-1941" (Zagreb-London 1976) we find crown proof that Britain created Yugoslavia and is directly responsible for the enslavement of Croats in Yugoslavia:  Britain and the Milner group were in the background during the 1945 Bleiburg massacre.




A Wrong Consciousness of "New Age":

The Era of Anti-Christ


Many books have been published by our contemporary civilization on the catastrophic situation in politics and culture. In 1993 in the Croatian town of Split, Robert Tafra, Ph.D. published a book "The Protocols of Sion Wise and the New World Order" a book which insists on the Freemasonic i.e. British-American aspect and origin of the NWO.  In any State, according to the author, Freemasonry has its own "Supreme advisory committee and the organisation is built up and coordinated according to a strict hierarchy".  Tafra explains how ex-mason Serge Raynaud de la Ferriere described the situation: At the top of the organisation of Freemasonic Lodges all over the world stands a universal body, that performs its common politics in all political parties under Freemasonic influence, which nowadays means the majority of political parties in the world. Freemasonry has its strongest organization in Anglo-Saxon countries and works through different secret societies with the same aim:  the creation of a universal state on the ground of religious synthesis of different beliefs. Great Britain especially, has developed the tradition with a large number of secret societies. The most influential of these was "The Fabian Society" (founded in 1884) which also transformed into The Round Table in 1891 (i.e. The Milner Group, according to Carroll Quigley, as we already know). The Round Table was inspired by the ideas of Professor John Ruskin (1819-1900), Oxford, who profiled the idea that the elite must direct the institutions and govern the world in a scientific way (Lord Milner was his student).  After WW1 there was a series of meetings organised by secret societies in Paris.  On the 30th May 1919, Harold Nicolson from "The Fabian Society" (i. e. Round Table/Milner Group) was present at one such meeting, and he left a record on that occasion.  On the 12th June 1919, there was a suggestion to found an "Institute of International Affairs" and in the USA, the "Institute of International Affairs American" later to become the "Council of Foreign Relations" (C.F.R.).  In Britain it was known as the "British Institute of International Affairs". After these negotiations, members of the secret societies entered into all of the most important areas of American political life (e.g. New York Times, NBC), as the author said, to manipulate public opinion. The unification of the world is founded on new ideological ideas that break especially with Christianity and the Catholic Church.  For that reason, after the crushing of Communism, Freemasonry in liberated countries, preferred collaboration with Communists and not with demo-Christian parties, because Christians were not capable of performing the orders in direction of any "constructive destruction" of their economies and countries, explains Tafra.


Very close to Croatia's Tafra (and an expert Ivan Mužić) is America's Ralph Epperson, a historian who studied the conspirative aspect of world history for more than 35 years.  According to Epperson, there are two types of historian: (1) Those who monitor history as a sequence of unplanned events: these are in the majority, and (2) those who consider history to be the realised result of a secret planned project: these are in the minority.   Epperson, of course, belongs to the second group.  His first book "The Unseen Hand, an Introduction to the Conspiratorial view of History" had nine editions until 1989 and tells a story of 270 years of American conspiratorial history.  The second book "The New World Order" published in Croatia in 1997 explains the relations between American politics and anti-Christian attitudes, which are understandably harmful to Croatia as a predominantly Christian country.  Epperson explains the roots and symbolism of Freemasonic philosophy and belief, and shows how America is a British-American illuminati project: a project of a Satanic anti-religion.  If we know more about the politics of secret societies in Britain and America, we can then explain why Croatia as a Catholic state is a hindrance to Freemasons in their plan to conquer the world: they do not need nations who will not obey their Satanic policy and are deeply rooted in Christianity.  On the contrary, their "philosophy" is that such nations must be uprooted.

            So we can conclude that there remains, against Croatia, a satanic enemy.




Bosnian precept the Anglo-American way


In 1998, a friend of mine, Zdravko Sanchevich, Ph.D., published his book "A Glance into Bosnia", a record of an Ambassador in Bosnia-Herzegovina. [12]  He dedicated the book to me privately, in his own hand, inviting my opinion on it and on the subject of Bosnia.  I had a special friendly impetus to review the book.  In short, it is an historic synthesis of the old cartography, and shows that all European cartographs considered Bosnia to be a part of Croatia.  The book is also an overview of the historical facts of the Bosnian war from March 1992 (when the war began) to 1995 (when the war ended). Sanchevich describes some of the British sabotage against Croats and Muslims in favour of Serbs and on p. 119, states that among the causes of the Muslim-Croatian conflict a very important role was played by foreign secret services, among them the British Intelligence Service, who played a central role. [13] I support his assessment, and add the fact that in the Croatian weekly "Danas", Zagreb, on 16th July 1993 a journalist Marko Barishich published an article with detailed information which proved that British commandos committed the Ahmichi massacre which set Muslims and the Bosnian military against Croats. The crime was not committed by the Croatian Military forces of Bosnian Croats, yet the Croatian General Tihofil Blashkich was sentenced to 45 years in prison at the Hague court.  The British, and some of their officers who committed the crime, were the main witnesses against General Blashkich.

After careful analysis, in my opinion the Dayton Bosnia is an Anglo-American project for the future destruction of Croatia: following the Dayton agreement from the 1st November 1995, with the help of Anglo-Americans, Serbs won ethnically cleansed territory: half of Bosnia, and Croats lost the positive results of the war having continuously won the battles.  In future political manipulations the British will try to direct the division of Bosnia in favour of the Serbs.  If Croatian Bosnia stays in the hands of the occupying Serbian intrusive element, Croatia will constantly stay under Greater Serbian pressure with the British facilitating change and future circumstances which will work against Croatian interest – for Croats, a most unpleasant political prospect.




Fascism conquering in the name of the state

and Liberalism in the name of Global Democracy


In 2000, "Dom i svijet" /"Home and World", Zagreb, published a short philosophic treatise by Dominican doctor of philosophy and master of Sacra Theologia from the Dominican order, Hyacinth Bošković (Selce, isle Brac, 1900 – 1947).  The book, entitled "The Philosophic sources of Fascism and National Socialism" was first published in Zagreb in 1939 and now there is a second edition with foreword by Petar Strcic, Academy of Science.  Bošković analysed the essence of the ideologies and explained that National Socialism had its roots in German idealistic philosophy and in the metaphysic of race, while Italian fascism was a reaction against communism, which, in the second phase transformed itself into the imperialism that was founded on German idealistic philosophy.  Mussolini refused the teaching in 1938 because Italian fascists had a new agreement with the Catholic Church and accordingly they were not allowed to propagate the philosophies, which were in opposition to the Church's teachings.  Thus fascism was left with imperialism, which believed in predomination by force.  Hyacinth Bošković is a Thomist and Thomism as an official teaching refutes German idealism.  "The ideologists of Fascism built their system on the premise that reality depends on thoughts, and what is more, from the thoughts we think. Those philosophers, whom we can count as subjectivists, immediately assert that no reality is independent from thoughts (…). Moral law depends on us.  We create the norm of life.  In the middle ages, we believed that the norm is imposed, we cannot escape its necessity which is put on every man…" From the overall paper, we can conclude that German idealism directed thinking into the state of subjectivism that brought the Germans and Italians to believe that they have the moral right to govern the world.  Bošković condemned such philosophies but he also condemned British liberalism, which grew up from the same subjective-rationalistic roots.  "…In the conception of liberalism there can be no talk about justice, because it stresses that each man must take care of himself, his property and is responsible for nothing else. Personal interest must be laid over the social interest (…).  It is a consequence of the philosophic teachings that proclaim to be modern, in an era that places man as master and norm of everything.  Man had become free from God and from all values. (…) \For that reason, Adam Smith formulated the law of economy: the economy had autonomy and is independent and free of state law and the law of God…" In this way the difference between fascism and liberalism exists simply in the fact that fascism conquers and spreads the imperia in the name of the state and liberalism camouflages the same aims in the name of democracy.  It is essential to keep sight of the fact that Bošković did not mention General Francisco Franco, who did not make war in the name of the new philosophies but in the name of the Church and against Freemasonry and Communism. 

Croats may conclude with pleasure that their tradition of political parties was always founded by the father of Croatia, Dr. Ante Starčević who developed his state philosophy on the grounds of Croatian state law and Christian morality (slogan: God and Croats).  There, Croatian political philosophy never grew out of any foreign philosophy i.e. out of the philosophy of Croatian enemies (who de facto also want us to be fascists).



The Croatian Region of Istra:

The Roots of Regionalism


"The Journal for Social Research" No 6-7/1993, published by the Institute for Social Research of Zagreb University, gave a very profound analysis on the Croatian Istra region under the title "Istra: Particularity and the General Croatian Context".  The review includes 14 papers that try, more or less scientifically to define Istra.

            In the Introduction, historian Miroslav Bertoša, talks about "the mosaic of broken social being…" and on page 594, Nevio Šetić, scientist from the city Pula's Institute for History, describes the national integration of Istra and Kvarner Isles as a fight for human rights.  Croats (the majority of inhabitants) fought for their right to equality (with Austrians and earlier with Venetians/Italians who governed the North-West coastal Croatian region).  The local Croatian Party of Right movement accepted the ideology of the existence of the Slavic people because the Croats (60%) needed the Slovenian minority (26%) to fight against foreign domination. These circumstances dictated an imbuing of national ideology by Starčević with the impact and a combination of the pan-Slavic ideology of Strossmayer.  From the earliest times (middle ages) the Croats of Istra had a strong cultural i.e. national identity, but separate interests of Italian and new ideologies (liberalism, brought through Italians and Garibaldi revolution) created a new ideological relativity.  The potentially main ideologist of a new regional party, Istra Democratic Party, Fulvio Suran (also a representative of the "Centre for Historic Research") defines national feeling and consciousness as a sort of atavism, a reflex, and not as a consciousness of cultural belonging.  He tries to create a new Istrian nationality, because he understands any nationality in a relativistic way " as a willingness that the given objects or phenomenon get a determined sense" (p. 770).  His theory of willingness conjures up the possibility that Istrianhood becomes a nation, because for Suran, nationality is founded on fiction, not by creative forces, unknown to his theory.  Suran explicitly says that "…. the truth of a given (national) identity in an area of ethnic plurality, like Istra, depends on its political 'strength', and the strongest of these is the political interpretation which is, without any reason, the only possible theory of the given reality".  Spiritually, Suran's theory is the closest relation to the liberal and leftist Marxist theories of Herbert Marcuse (a leading representative of the American school of psychological war) from the "Frankfurt School" and it defines his intellectual attitude and background.  Marcuse refused any unique culture (a national culture!) and recommended the atomisation of society with initiatives given to large groups (Essay on Liberalisation, The End of Utopia). [14] Stipan Trogrlich can find a further reason for the theoretic relativism of nationality in Istra in a paper "Istra between Clericalism and Liberalism".  He explains that until 1912, Istra ideologically had fought clerically and liberally oriented groups of teachers, i.e. the intelligence that respected the Church and tradition and the intelligence which was liberally (= Masonic) oriented, anti-traditional and national.  Liberal groups won the battle and got the predominant influence.  This is the answer to why it is possible in Istra to have such impossible theories on nationhood. There, the "cosmopolite" ideology of national enemies has won the first historic battle against Christian traditionalism. We must yet face, and win, the second battle for a strong national identity.





A book on Tudjman: provocation or truth?


In the year 2000, right wing extremist Mladen Schwartz (b.1947, Croatian Jew who lived with his parents in the Serbian capital Belgrade) published a book, in Zagreb, entitled "Croatia after Tudjman": A Study on National Fate, part of a planned  "Collected works by M. Schwartz". There are certain aspects of the work, which render it unacceptable to the future integrity and truthful development of Croatian ideology.

            Schwartz, in his clever analysis of the period 1941 - 1945, stresses "the principles of the Croatian Uprising Movement (Ustasha Movement) did not reveal any typically fascist characteristics. If anything, it incorporated liberal and Marxist values (The fruit of any value is revealed in the action taken, article 14, "Hrvatsko pravo", 1993, No. 15/16) …" Then surprisingly, on page 455, he declares: " In this time of the progressive global process towards the annihilation of free nations (…) it is almost considered honorable to be a fascist…" Conclusions of this nature could place Schwartz under a mantle of suspicion: who is he, actually?  Croatian nationalists do not agree with colonial world globalism, but we are not fascists - we never were.

Furthermore, in Chapter 16, "Memoirs on my acquaintance with Tudjman", Schwartz recounts Tudjman's meeting with Croats in Hamburg, Germany in what appears to be a very contradictory way: "On the 6th of May 1989 we (Croatian cultural communion in Hamburg) assembled in a Freemasonic lodge (…)(Tudjman) announced the publishing of his book: "Trackless region of the Croatian reality" and a party journal "Voice of Croatian Democratic Union".  He then praised General Francisco Franco, who had erected a common monument to all victims of the Spanish civil war…" Now, if we accept that Franco was a Roman Catholic General, and prosecutor of Freemasonry, which stood beside Spanish communism and liberalism, would it not be a bit incongruous to have Tudjman praise him in a Freemasonic lodge?

At this point we must pose some questions about Mladen Schwartz's ideological identity:

1. What is his aim?  If he did not tell the truth, what purpose did he have in presenting untrue facts?  In his book, he attacks global Freemasonry, yet contrary to this he connects Croatian nationalism with cosmopolitan Freemasonry. How could Tudjman praise General Franco, who prosecuted Freemasonry (Croatian leader Pavelic in the period 1941-1945 did not even do that), in a Freemasonic lodge?  Franco was the only right wing politician without any political or ideological connection to Freemasonry: he was a real representative of the Roman Catholic Church and not an ideological fascist. In present-day atheistic Europe it is no longer popular to be a Catholic Francophile: yet he was the very opposite to Hitler who propagated a neopaganism, very close to Freemasonry. [15]

2. If the occasion described by Swartz actually happened, we should ask ourselves: did Freemasonry stimulate Croats in the direction of political renewal, only to control them later on the grounds of political collaboration? If so, did Freemasonry have tacit agreement, on these grounds, to work against the state through the media, in the name of free press and democracy for their own "international purpose"?

3. Did there exist, in the enslaved Croatia, an underground resistance of so-called Croatian Freemasons, who resisted Serbian central power because they wanted to balance power among the Freemasonic brothers in some future Confederate of Yugoslavia?     

Chapter 12 of Swartz's book "Coup d'etat: from the left or from the right?" is highly controversial. When he suggests the need for a coup d'etat to break the humiliations, prosecutions and lawless behavior of the "international community" towards Croatia, he observes that such a "rebellion could not be successful (…) without consultations with partners outside the country…" (p. 383) How can we talk about outside 'partners,' if the whole world is in the hands of "the centers of the Jewish-Freemasonic internationals"(p. 259) who work against Croatia, as described by Schwartz (a Croatian Jew!)?

In view of the above, I can only conclude that Mr. Schwarz must be a very interesting person. Some further conclusions can be found in the unabridged version of my book.




[1] Evans, Arthur John: "Illyrian Letters", translation by Hrvatski zapisnik, Hannover – Čakovec 2001, letter No. 8, page 53

[2] Engdahl, William: «The Century of War», A. G. M. Zagreb 1999, page 49

[3] See: Biondić, Ivo: «Magna Fraus» (Great Fraud), Zagreb 2000

[4] Concerning British, please, refer also to:  www.amazon.com  and to book


Diplomacy by Deception, by DR John Coleman

Chapter IX: Yugoslavia in focus

16,95 US$

Paperback - 272 pages (1993/1998)

Global Insights; ISBN: 0964010488

BridGer House Publishers, inc.



Antony C. Sutton:   "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution"

[5] Chomsky, Noam: "World Orders Old and New", Columbia University Press / New York ISBN 0 -231 -10157 - 0 (1994,1996)

"...Yet, at the end of World War Two, George Kennan, Soviet specialist, former US ambassador to the USSR, and later a 'dove' himself, was absolutely clear: '[…] We have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. […] Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; […] We should stop putting ourselves in the position of our brothers' keeper [...].' (Kennan himself, it seems, was not immune to illusion about American 'idealism'.)"

Failed Crusade; America and the Tragedy of Post-Communist Russia, by Stephen F. Cohen

Search: Kennan http://www.3bh.org.uk/IV/index.htm

[6] Grand Central Station, New York, Emissary Publications, Books in Focus, 1981

[7] Quigley, Carroll: "The Anglo-American Establishment", p. 15

[8] ibidem p. 34

[9] p. 70

[10] Also: Quigley, Carroll: "Tragedy and Hope", 1966 Macmillan Company, New York (Emissary Publications, Clackamas, OR 97015, USA), page 144

[11] Carroll Quigley: "The Anglo-American Establishment", p. 126

[12] Sančević, Zdravko: «Pogled u Bosnu», Naprijed, 1998 Zagreb.

[13] Also, see: Simms, Brendan «Unfinest Hour; Britan and the Destruction of Bosnia», Penguin Books Ltd, 2002 London

[14] Marcuse, Herbert: «Kraj utopije. Esej o oslobođenju», in: «Teorija društva u Frankfurtskoj školi» («The Theory of Society in the Frankfurt School») by Vjeran Katunarić (Editor in Chef), Zagreb 1990, page 387-401

[15] Baigent, Michael (Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln):  The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, (Sveti gral, sveta krv) London: Arrow Books Limited 1996,  p. 198


Davor Pavuna
   Desmond Egan   WW 2 in Croatia

FastCounter by bCentral

  Add Me!   SubmitFree: Submit to 25+ Search Engines for free !!!!