How Yugoslavia was created
In 2001, Mr. Ljudevit Krmpotić, Ph.D. made an important contribution to historical
research when he translated "Illyrian Letters" into Croatian, a book
written by the British spy, archeologist and adventurer Arthur John Evans
(1851-1941), and added significant comment.
Evans traveled through the countries of the future Yugoslavia from 1875
and his pro-Serbian travelogue with political undertones was published by the "Manchester
Guardian" newspaper (from 8th of February 1877 onwards). The "Illyrian Letters" are interesting because
they are yet another proof that Englishmen planned and founded Yugoslavia.
Evans reports: "quiet forces are acting on the foundation of the South Slav
communion", and it aims at the "…isolation of Croats and their artificial
nationality!"… (Translation
back into English)
In a letter dated 1st December 1883,
British Prime Minister Gladstone refers to a discussion between Elliot, a
politician and the Austrian Ambassador Kalnoky on the possible creation of
socialist republics on the Austrian borders.
This indicates that the British had investigated possible reactions to
political developments around Austria in times very distant from that, which we
now know as a period of the communist socialist republics. Evans expectation of
the creation of (socialist) Yugoslavia was fulfilled by his successor R.W.
Seton-Watson (1879–1951), who supported communist paratroopers during WW
II, thus helping to create the "socialist republics".
If we evaluate how the history of the region
unfolded, we can easily arrive at a thesis, from the book "Illyrian Letters",
that the British had conceived this plan hundreds of years earlier. In
correspondence between the Yugoslav ideologist bishop Juraj Strossmayer
and British Prime Minister Gladstone (letters from 11th April
1878, and 12th October 1882), Strossmayer expressed his hopes for
the salvation of an Austrian state as a force for political balance between the
Germans and Slavs. To Gladstone, he also recommended a promotion of the
Yugoslav idea by European Freemasonry (which Strossmayer had already officially
attacked in his Catholic epistles!).
Throughout the book it is evident that Evans saw
the Serbs to be the greatest hope of British political expectations. Serbs
indeed realized such British hope: Croats experienced it.
American
"New World Order"
As an English Neocolonial Enslavement of the World
On the 14th December 1999, the Zagreb
publishing house "Antun Gustav Matoš", organized a conference entitled "The
Forum of the Zagreb City" at 27, Kaptol Square, to introduce "The century of
War". This book, published for the first time in Germany in 1992, is one of
the most important history books of 20th century on the aims and
methods of Anglo-American imperialism. Speakers included the author William
F. Engdahl, together with journalists Mirjana Rakić, and Željko Krušelj and
historian Antun Abramović (a reviewer of the Emil Čić's "A History of Croatian
Enemies")
The book points to the fact that the British
Establishment, in furthering British colonial interests, constantly produced
wars in the 20th century.
The first and the second WW's were the result of British political
perfidy and Adolf Hitler's rise to power (with the British assistance!) gave the British good reason to wage a war that
would, they hoped, serve as the final destruction of Germany, and secure
British predomination in the world. In
the context of such British policy, there were important reasons for the
creation of a British Yugoslavia.
Three axes of the British Empire were/are oil,
the banking system and the seaways to her colonies. These were endangered by German industrial capability. By 1896
Germany had opened a railway line from Berlin to Konia village, in the depths
of Turkey. For the first time the railway created a direct traffic link to
Baghdad and Kuwait. However, from a British point of view this was no reason to
be happy. R. G. D. Laffan, a British military adviser to the Serbian Army
(before WW I), warned British politicians that the Berlin-Baghdad rail
project would result in a unified continental area under German control.
This could endanger British naval predominance with consequential loss of
wealth and influence. For Laffan, Serbia was a front line of defence for the
British colonies. If Serbia were to be
incorporated into the Berlin-Baghdad project then the weak links to British
Colonies would greatly benefit from the strong impact of German penetration to
the East! For that reasons Serbia got a
central role in the destruction of the Austrian Empire and subsequent creation
of Yugoslavia. Croats were subject to a Serbian dominated political state, with
its terrorizing machinery, aimed at hindering German penetration to the East
over the Croatian coastal and continental area.
According to Engdahl, in 1973, American masters
of oil politics organized a business meeting in the city of Saltsjoebaden,
Sweden. Present in this "Bilderberg
group" (that existed from the time of their meeting in Germany in 1954),
was Robert D. Murphy, a man who in 1922 planned and recommended "project
Hitler" (and then planned the Anglo American government of the world together
with the Americans). In 1944, he projected American politics in Germany and
later, from the office of the Military advisor in Germany, co-governed Germany
from 1945 till 1949.
For Croats this meant that the British supported
the same strategic politics with the Serbs and Yugoslavia (with the rest of
Croatian enemies) with the resultant continuous destructive impact on Croatian freedom. Today, the same planners think in the same
way and support similar legislators who think like them. History has taken the
same direction. Therefore, it would be foolhardy of any nation to ignore such
facts.
The Beginning of The Third Millennium
In The Light of the Thought of Blessed Cardinal Alojzije
Stepinac (1898 – 1960)
At the end of my article in the Croatian
Literary Review "MARULIĆ" 1994/ No. 05, on a series of thoughts by
Blessed Cardinal Alojzije Stepinac, I quoted the following extract from his
diary dated 5th November 1940 (printed in the weekly
"Danas": Zagreb, on 7th August, 1990). "The world is bound for
its destruction, indeed, unless God saves it with his mighty hand by miraculous
means. If Germany happens to win the war, there will be terrible terror and
ruin for small nations. If England wins the war, the Freemasons, the Jews, that
is to say immorality and corruption will stay in power in our countries. If the
USSR wins the war, then Satan and hell will have gained power over the world.
Therefore, where shall we raise our eyes but to Thee, oh Lord?..." Prophetic words, indeed, as history later
recorded.
Hitler's
Germany spread horrible terror, and after the Independent State of Croatia had
been ruined, the Communist devil and hell won the war: The fight for an
independent state by the majority of Croats (more than two thirds of the population) was branded as
"Fascism", and between 1941 and 1950 the Communists/ "Antifascists", with special
assistance from the English, massacred
about half a million Croats (at the Austrian city of Bleiburg in May 1945). In order to deflect attention from that crime,
they invented the Jasenovac (concentration camp) myth that 700,000 Serbs and
Jews were killed there. In
"Večernji list" ("The Evening News") of 6th January 2001 we
read: "...At the Croatian State Archives there are always some new
documents about the Jasenovac victims being found. (...) According to the 1946
census, in the People's Republic of Croatia there were about 159,193 persons
altogether killed and missing throughout the war. The Union of the Fighters
(Communist veterans) claimed that this number was inaccurate, and so a new
census was organized and repeated four years later. Judging from reports, it
was first assumed that there were some 300,000 victims, divided according to
the kind of suffering, nationality, sex and profession. The final report,
according to Croatian historian Mate Rupić (at the meeting of Croatian and
Serbian historians in Pechuh, Hungary, 2000), established the fact that there
had been about 155,142 to 156,226 victims. A difference of about one thousand
people (sic!) was brought about by the lack of coordination of statistical
methods. (...) However, in order to establish the real truth about the
Jasenovac concentration camp, it is necessary to know that the census of 1950
estimated 34,711 people to have been killed at the concentration camps in
Croatia. This census embraced not only the concentration camps in Croatia, but
also those (Croatian citizens) out of Croatia, including Italy and the Third
Reich…."
What then
was the Second World War experience for Croats? A subjugation imposed by British Freemasons, who supported the
atheistic Communist partisans, who fought against the Catholic believers, with
a victory granted by the British: against the Domobrans and Ustasha fighters who
were declared to be Fascists, in spite of the fact that their ideology was not
Fascist: their ideology was founded on the Peasant Party (20th
century) of Stjepan Radić and on the Party of The Croatian State Right ideology
by Ante Starčević (19th century). For the first time in the history of Croatia
as antemurale christianitatis (the title given by the Pope), Croatian
crusaders were defeated by godless persons and Satanists who defamed a lot of
innocent victims. Not only had English Freemasons gained power over the world,
but the darkest Balkanic primitivism spread all over Croatia too. Until 1945,
Croatia was firmly anchored in Europe and from 1945 onwards, for the first time
in its history, Croatia fell under the Balkans: all mechanisms of defence were
destroyed. The Serbian announcement: "Struggle to extermination, ours or
yours!" by Nikola Stojanović, a young Bosnian Serb, which
appeared so impudently and shamelessly in the "Srpski književni
glasnik", published by Serbs in the Croatian capital of Zagreb in 1902,
was thus put into action. However, the Croatian people survived the greatest
disaster and tragedy in their history. After the ruin of the Independent State
of Croatia, the nation did not even have a right to be associated with the
defeated peoples and states: the Croatian legal Army was executed in captivity,
and the state was destroyed and given as a present to the Serbs and their
Croatian Communist servants who never ceased to repeat: "We cannot live
without Serbs, and they cannot live without us. Who are we without Serbs and
who are Serbs without us?"
Once again, it was Blessed Cardinal Stepinac who
testified that the Croatian people had lost their liberty: "...We demand
the absolute freedom of the Catholic press, the absolute freedom of Catholic
schools in all the classes in primary and secondary schools (...), the absolute
freedom of the human personality and his inalienable rights...." (A
Pastoral Letter on 20th September 1945). With the loss of their
freedom, the Croats lost their entire culture: beginning with the imposition of
Western Balkans ideology instead of that of "Mitteleuropa", Central
Europe! If the English - and the
Freemasons, opponents of the Catholic Church and Catholicism, - won the battle
what could Croats expect but the denial of the right to their own culture and
state, which grew from the ground of Christian belief? Ever since 1918, when
the British created the state of Yugoslavia as defence against the Catholic
Austro-Hungarian Empire and the German "Drang nach Osten" all the way
to Baghdad and India, the Croats have been in the same position: as Catholics
relying on Rome, the Croats have been disturbing modern Freemasonry, which
relies on the Serbs. Ever since the time of Napoleon's Illyrian provinces,
Freemasonry has been spreading all over Croatia, and even further. As a
geopolitical unity, Croatia (as a free state) gravitates towards Italy and
Germany, which to British interests means cutting off a line of survivability
to the British Empire (transformed into a Commonwealth of colonised "free
nations."). This then is the main reason why it is necessary to erase
Croatia from the geographic map. Regarding the Hague Court of Injustice, Croats
should not be surprised: it is actually part of the mechanism for the total
destruction of Croatia and its moral right to be an independent state. Just consider this fact: who are the most
important "witnesses" against Croatia at the Hague Court? Once again,
it is the British, their military officers (whom Croatians regard with
justified suspicion as acting in favour of the conflict between Croats and
Muslims and who perpetrated the massacre in Ahmici, Bosnia/Herzegovina),
and an English politician Paddy Ashdown, the leader of the Liberal Party!
In a lot of articles by Dr. Milan Šufflay (1879-1931)
- a famous scholar in his day - it is easy to find a leitmotiv for the central
thesis about British predominance in the world and reasons for British
political behaviour. Šufflay outlined the contents and quoted from the book "The
Day of The Saxons", written by Homer Lea and published in
London in 1912. In this book, called by Šufflay 'the New Testament of the
British world politics', there are two striking axioms: "...The first, is
that anything that happens in any part of the world directly influences Great
Britain. The second, is that the loss of India, after the loss of the British
Isles, would be the greatest blow for the Empire..." So wrote Šufflay in
his article "The British Empire" (p. 219, Dr. Milan Šufflay,
Selected Essays, Vol. 2, Publications of Darko Sagrak, Zagreb 2000). In further texts, it becomes clear why the
eyes of the Serbs are always turned in the direction of London, towards the
creators of Yugoslavia (as described in Šufflay's article "Over The Abyss
of The Two Worlds", published in "Hrvatsko pravo" on 29th June,
1929). In this article Šufflay was the first to point his finger at the real
creators of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, namely the Englishmen Wickham Steed and
Seton Watson, (Šufflay, Selected Essays, Vol. 1, Zagreb 1999).
Throughout the 20th century Croatia
has been, we may say, a real victim of Satan and of the greatest evil that
could befall it: if ever injustice so strongly and completely triumphed over
Croatia, it happened precisely in the 20th century. The Communists
succeeded in educating legions of janissaries, brainwashed heads, so-called
independent Croatian intellectuals who loyally spat on the notions of national
identity. Geographically, the enemy cut Croatian Syrmium
with the ethnically Croatian city of Zemun. The historically Croatian province
of Bosnia was ethnically cleansed from Croatian inhabitants and Serbs and
Communists exterminated the old Bosnian Muslim aristocracy, conscious of their
Croatian origin and Croatian statehood.
In the remaining parts of Croatia, enemies corrupted the media in order
to spit slavishly on aspirations for independence and finally, when General
Blaškić was condemned by The Hague Court, contrary to God's justice, we did not
hear a unanimous and clear condemnation of that legal crime from leaders of the
Catholic Church. Therefore, resembling the prophets of the Old Testament, we
must cry out: "Alas, O Israel, for today you abandoned so many just
persons - tomorrow you will deny Christ".
Therefore, where shall we raise our eyes but to
Thee, oh Lord? - said Blessed Cardinal Stepinac.
"The Anglo-American Establishment"
The untold story of the Anglo-American ruling
of the World
Introduction
The world's
books and journals are full of titles, which speak of the new Anglo-American
imperialism called "The New World Order".
In Croatia some articles explain the background to the forces behind
such ideology. Marinko Bobanovich, in his article "Virtual liberty"
("Vjesnik", 2nd February 1997) recounted the story of British
journalist Mark Fisher, published in the journal "Index of
Censorship" and on the web in 1997. The article reveals that Britain
exercises total control of information in their area despite laws that
guarantee freedom of information. According to European Court of Justice
records from Strasbourg, human rights are violated to such an extent in Britain
that there is no comparable example in Europe "(…) and among 26
member-countries, Britain alone has no law on human rights." Journalist Maja
Freundlich published an article "Colonies, the Rulers of the World and New
Colonies" (8th February 1998) in which she quotes from Noam
Chomsky's book "A Rich Minority and Unrest Majority" (1992/93). The quotes
give us the complete picture. According
to Maja (Maya) Freundlich, at a meeting with British Premier Tony Blair on Friday 6th
February 1998, USA President Clinton said, "Our two nations must continue to
collaborate in ruling the world".In 2001, his successor, President Bush Jr., confirmed the "special
relations" of USA and Britain. But the
"special relations" referred to neo-colonial plans under the outside illusive
mask of the liberation and democratisation of the world. Chomsky quoted a
secret political paper by George Kennan U.S. minister of Foreign Affairs (in 1948) who
wrote "We possess some 50% of the world's riches and just 6.3% of the world
population. Our real aim is to impose
the relations that will make it possible to keep such an imbalance…" We find a
similar opinion in Chomsky's book "World Orders Old and New": "For
the former colonies, the principles of global planning
entailed that "ultra nationalist" tendencies must be suppressed. U.S.
interests were seen to be threatened by "radical and nationalistic
regimes" that are responsive to popular pressures for "immediate
improvement in the low living standards of the masses" and development for
domestic needs. The reasons are clear: such tendencies conflict with the need
for "a political and economic climate conducive to private investment"
with adequate repatriation of profits (NSC 5432/1, 1954), and the need for
"protection of our raw materials" (Kennan). In a comprehensive secret policy review in 1948,
Kennan cautioned that "we should cease to talk about vague and ...
unreal objectives such as human rights, the raising of the living standards,
and democratisation" we must "deal in straight power concepts,"
not "hampered by idealistic slogans" about "altruism and
world-benefaction," if we are to maintain the "position of
disparity" that separates our enormous wealth from the poverty of others…"
It is clear from the rest of the
article that for the New World Order, the most dangerous enemies are
nationalists and nationalist ideology.
Only patriots would resist plans which attempt to realize a new
enslavement and imbalance of property.
In the Austrian journal "Spectrum"
(14th March 1998) an article "War on the Screen" by Jakob
Steuerer described how totalitarian methods rule information and the
world. He reports that phone calls,
e-mails and faxes are redirected to the strategic centre in London after which
they are sent via satellite to "Fort Meade" in Maryland, USA. The article quoted from a report by Steve
Right for the European Union.
Under such circumstances an
Anglo-American Establishment of this nature traditionally means disrespect for
the Croatian state, rights and economic stability, because Anglo-Americans have
always insisted on their old geopolitical aims and plans, traditionally harmful
for Croatia.
"The Anglo-American
Establishment"
by Carroll Quigley
"The Anglo-American Establishment", a book by
Carroll Quigley (1910-1977) excavates the roots of British-American
technology for ruling the world. In the
second half of the nineteenth century, 1891, according to Quigley, Lord Cecil
Rhodes (1853-1902) and Lord Alfred Milner (who died in 1925) founded a Secret
Society (later known as the Milner Group) with the aim of preserving the future
of the British Empire. In 1877, Rhodes
conceived, in his first will, the purpose of
his Secret Society.
- The
extension of British rule throughout the world…
- Colonization
by British subjects of all lands…
- The
ultimate recovery of the U.S.A. as an integral part of the British Empire…
- The
foundation of so great a power as to hereafter render wars impossible and
promote the best interests of humanity…
After 1889,
Cecil and Rhodes acted in the form of Imperial Federalists. The first founders and ideological inspirers
were William T. Stead
(1849-1912), a famous British journalist of his period
and Reginald Balliol Brett, later Lord Esher, a friend and advisor of Queen
Victoria. Their methods "can be summed
up under three headings: (a) a triple-front penetration in politics, education
and journalism: (b) the recruitment of men of ability (chiefly from All Souls,
Oxford) and the linking of these men to the Cecil Bloc by matrimonial alliances
and by gratitude for titles and positions of power and (c) the influencing of
public policy by placing members of the Cecil Bloc in positions shielded as
much as possible from public attention…" In short:
to perform such a plan they were divided into the "Society of the Elect" and
"The Association of Helpers". During the first half of the 20th
century the Society controlled the most influential journal of high society:
"The Times" (in 1922 completely); important positions in some other influential
journals and the most important political positions in Britain and the U.S.A.
Oxford University had become their recruiting centre for future British
aristocracy of Imperial spirit and the Rhodes Scholarships were founded with
the aim of supporting this project.
The
Secret Society was patterned on the Jesuits.
In a letter to the trustee of his third will, Rhodes instructed how the
society was to be formed, saying: "In considering questions suggested take
Constitution of the Jesuits if obtainable and insert 'English Empire' for
'Roman Catholic Religion'…" A member of the group H. A. L. Fisher (1865-1940) explained their new religion in a book "Our New
Religion" (1929), dealing with "Christian Science." "In connection with this last book, it might
be mentioned that Christian Science became the religion of the "Milner
Group", and the information indicates that members of the group belonged to
the sect of Freemasonic illuminati. Antony Sutton in his book "American
Secret Establishment" said that the Freemasonic order of "Skull and Bones",
to whom ex-U.S.A. President George Bush Snr. belongs, is a part of the Round
Table founded by Cecil Rhodes and related to illuminati /Freemasons. So, what can we now expect from his son Bush
Jnr.?
The
story of the Secret British Society is very important information as it
explains a lot of things. We believed that the British Empire was dissolved
with the foundation of the Commonwealth of Nations, but the story of the Milner
group and the secret society reveals that the aim in fact was to transform the
Empire into the Commonwealth! As Quigley explains, their aim was to control
ex-colonial countries by a system of Round Table groups worldwide, and to
found the League of Nations (later the United Nations), which would be a
manipulative part of the Secret Society.
The father of the Commonwealth idea was a member of the Milner Group. His name was Lionel Curtis
(1872-1955). In 1916, he published a
book entitled "The Commonwealth of Nations". As Quigley says "Reluctantly,
Curtis and others postponed the idea of a federated Empire and fell back on the
idea of trying to hold the Empire together by the intangible bonds of common
culture and common outlook. This had
(in Rhodes and Milner) been a supplement to the project of a larger world
federation. (…) At the same time the idea of federation was swallowed up in a
larger scheme for the organisation of the whole world in a League of Nations."
Such
development of British (-American) secret 'Round Table-political ideas' gives
us a general paradigm of the real British strategic goals: complete
predominance in the world
and always with the same goals. For Croatia this means
that the explanations given by Croatian ideologist Milan von Sufflay on the
British creation of Yugoslavia have a very important significance: their
strategic relations did not change. The
British (Americans) will be determined to control or destroy Croatia.
The Founder of
Yugoslavia William Seton-Watson
And
the politics of the Milner Group in Europe
If you ever find and
completely read the book "Anglo-American Establishment" (from Rhodes to
Cliveden), you will not find
any mention of the word "Yugoslavia" except in the last footnote. Croatia is not mentioned
at all. The active creator of
Yugoslavia, Scotsman William Seton-Watson, (1879-1951) appears briefly on page
186. He is mentioned as a member of a scientific symposium of the "Royal
Institute of International Affairs," Chatham House, organised by the
Milner Group in the period 1933 – 1934.
Other speakers during the same period included Ormsby-Gore, Oliver
Lyttelton, Edward Grigg, Donald Somervell, Toynbee, Zimmern, R.W.
Seton-Watson and Lord Lothian: the majority of whom were the most important
representatives of the Milner Group at the time. This was the same period during which Hitler came to power, with
British help. On p.273, of his book "The Anglo American
Establishment",
Quigley gives a direct explanation of the importance of Yugoslavia for the
Milner Group and the objectives of Seton-Watson: "The countries marked for
liquidation (by Hitler's intervention) included Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland,
but did not include Greece and Turkey since the Group had no intention of
allowing Germany to get down to the Mediterranean "lifeline". Indeed the purpose of the Hoare-Laval plan
of 1935, which wrecked the collective-security system by seeking to give most
of Ethiopia to Italy, was intended to bring an appeased Italy into position
alongside England, in order to block any movement of Germany southward rather
than eastward. The plan failed because
Mussolini decided that he could get more out of England by threats from the
side of Germany that from cooperation at the side of England"… This meant that
for the British the creation and survival of the then Yugoslavia was of the
greatest importance. The German expansion took place according to a Milner Group
plan, which intended to push Germany into the world war, which Germany would be
held completely responsible for planning and provoking. For the British group, Yugoslavia was also
on the way "…down onto the Mediterranean 'lifeline'…"!!! They planned to have
Mussolini's Italy as an ally.
As has been already
said, the words "Yugoslavia" or "Croatia" (as a part of Yugoslavia) appear nowhere in the
book except in footnote 3 on p. 335 in Quigley's comment that "the last public
act of the Milner Group was the drawing of the Italo-Yugoslav boundary in
1946. The British Delegate on the
Boundary Commission was C.H. Waldock, now a Chichele Professor and Fellow of
All Souls, assisted by R.J. Stopford…" Furthermore, the a book entitled
"Seton-Watson and the Yugoslavs, Correspondence 1906-1941" (Zagreb-London 1976) we
find crown proof that Britain created Yugoslavia and is directly responsible
for the enslavement of Croats in Yugoslavia:
Britain and the Milner group were in the background during the 1945
Bleiburg massacre.
A Wrong Consciousness of "New Age":
The Era of Anti-Christ
Many books have been
published by our contemporary civilization on the catastrophic situation in
politics and culture. In 1993 in the Croatian town of Split, Robert Tafra,
Ph.D. published a book "The Protocols of Sion Wise and the New World Order"
a book which insists on the Freemasonic i.e. British-American aspect and origin
of the NWO. In any State, according to
the author, Freemasonry has its own "Supreme advisory committee and the
organisation is built up and coordinated according to a strict hierarchy". Tafra explains how ex-mason Serge Raynaud
de la Ferriere described the situation: At the top of the organisation of
Freemasonic Lodges all over the world stands a universal body, that performs
its common politics in all political parties under Freemasonic influence, which
nowadays means the majority of political parties in the world. Freemasonry has
its strongest organization in Anglo-Saxon countries and works through different
secret societies with the same aim: the
creation of a universal state on the ground of religious synthesis of different
beliefs. Great Britain especially, has developed the tradition with a large
number of secret societies. The most influential of these was "The Fabian
Society" (founded
in 1884) which
also transformed into The
Round Table in 1891 (i.e. The Milner Group, according to Carroll Quigley, as we
already know). The Round Table was inspired by the ideas of Professor John
Ruskin
(1819-1900),
Oxford, who profiled the idea
that the elite must direct the institutions and govern the world in a
scientific way (Lord Milner was his student).
After WW1 there was a series of meetings organised by secret societies in
Paris. On the 30th May 1919,
Harold Nicolson from "The Fabian Society" (i. e. Round Table/Milner Group) was present at one such
meeting, and he left a record on that occasion. On the 12th June 1919, there was a suggestion to found
an "Institute of International Affairs" and in the USA, the "Institute of
International Affairs American" later to become the "Council of Foreign
Relations" (C.F.R.). In Britain it was
known as the "British Institute of International Affairs". After these
negotiations, members of the secret societies entered into all of the most
important areas of American political life (e.g. New York Times, NBC), as the
author said, to manipulate public opinion. The unification of the world is
founded on new ideological ideas that break especially with Christianity and
the Catholic Church. For that reason,
after the crushing of Communism, Freemasonry in liberated countries, preferred
collaboration with Communists and not with demo-Christian parties, because
Christians were not capable of performing the orders in direction of any "constructive destruction" of their economies and
countries,
explains Tafra.
Very close to Croatia's
Tafra (and an expert Ivan Mužić) is America's Ralph Epperson, a
historian who studied the conspirative aspect of world history for more than 35
years. According to Epperson, there are
two types of historian: (1) Those who monitor history as a sequence of
unplanned events: these are in the majority, and (2) those who consider history
to be the realised result of a secret planned project: these are in the
minority. Epperson, of course, belongs
to the second group. His first book "The Unseen Hand, an
Introduction to the Conspiratorial view of History" had nine editions until
1989 and tells a story of 270 years of American conspiratorial history. The second book "The New World Order"
published in Croatia in 1997 explains the relations between American politics
and anti-Christian attitudes, which are understandably harmful to Croatia as a
predominantly Christian country.
Epperson explains the roots and symbolism of Freemasonic philosophy and
belief, and shows how America is a British-American illuminati project: a
project of a Satanic anti-religion. If
we know more about the politics of secret societies in Britain and America, we
can then explain why Croatia as a Catholic state is a hindrance to Freemasons
in their plan to conquer the world: they do not need nations who will not obey
their Satanic policy and are deeply rooted in Christianity. On the contrary, their "philosophy" is that
such nations must be uprooted.
So
we can conclude that there remains, against Croatia, a satanic enemy.
Bosnian precept the Anglo-American way
In 1998, a friend of
mine, Zdravko Sanchevich, Ph.D., published his book "A Glance into
Bosnia", a record of an Ambassador in Bosnia-Herzegovina. He dedicated the book to me privately, in
his own hand, inviting my opinion on it and on the subject of Bosnia. I had a special friendly impetus to review
the book. In short, it is an historic
synthesis of the old cartography, and shows that all European cartographs
considered Bosnia to be a part of Croatia.
The book is also an overview of the historical facts of the Bosnian war
from March 1992 (when the war began) to 1995 (when the war ended). Sanchevich
describes some of the British sabotage against Croats and Muslims in favour of
Serbs and on p. 119,
states that among the causes of the Muslim-Croatian conflict a very important
role was played by foreign secret services, among them the British Intelligence
Service, who played a central role. I support his
assessment, and add the fact that in the Croatian weekly "Danas", Zagreb, on 16th
July 1993 a journalist Marko Barishich published an article with detailed
information which proved that British commandos committed the Ahmichi massacre
which set Muslims and the Bosnian military against Croats. The crime was not
committed by the Croatian Military forces of Bosnian Croats, yet the Croatian
General Tihofil Blashkich was sentenced to 45 years in prison at the Hague
court. The British, and some of their
officers who committed the crime, were the main witnesses against General
Blashkich.
After careful analysis,
in my opinion the Dayton Bosnia is an Anglo-American project for the future
destruction of Croatia: following the Dayton agreement from the 1st
November 1995, with the help of Anglo-Americans, Serbs won ethnically cleansed
territory: half of Bosnia, and Croats lost the positive results of the war
having continuously won the battles. In
future political manipulations the British will try to direct the division of
Bosnia in favour of the Serbs. If
Croatian Bosnia stays in the hands of the occupying Serbian intrusive element,
Croatia will constantly stay under Greater Serbian pressure with the British
facilitating change and future circumstances which will work against Croatian
interest – for Croats, a most unpleasant political prospect.
Fascism conquering in the name of the state
and Liberalism in the name of
Global Democracy
In 2000, "Dom
i svijet" /"Home and World", Zagreb, published a short philosophic treatise by
Dominican doctor of philosophy and master of Sacra Theologia from the Dominican
order, Hyacinth Bošković (Selce, isle Brac, 1900 – 1947). The book, entitled "The Philosophic
sources of Fascism and National Socialism" was first published in Zagreb in
1939 and now there is a second edition with foreword by Petar Strcic, Academy
of Science. Bošković analysed the
essence of the ideologies and explained that National Socialism had its roots
in German idealistic philosophy and in the metaphysic of race,
while Italian fascism was a reaction against communism, which, in the second
phase transformed itself into the imperialism that was founded on German
idealistic philosophy. Mussolini
refused the teaching in 1938 because Italian fascists had a new agreement with
the Catholic Church and accordingly they were not allowed to propagate the philosophies,
which were in opposition to the Church's teachings. Thus fascism was left with imperialism, which believed in
predomination by force. Hyacinth
Bošković is a Thomist and Thomism as an official teaching refutes German
idealism. "The ideologists of Fascism
built their system on the premise that reality
depends on thoughts, and what is more, from the thoughts we think. Those philosophers, whom we can count as
subjectivists, immediately assert that no reality is
independent from thoughts (…). Moral law depends on us.
We create the norm of life. In
the middle ages, we believed that the norm is imposed,
we cannot escape its necessity which is put on every man…" From the overall
paper, we can conclude that German idealism directed thinking into the state of
subjectivism that brought the Germans and Italians to believe that they have
the moral right to govern the world.
Bošković condemned such philosophies but he also condemned British
liberalism, which grew up from the same subjective-rationalistic roots. "…In the conception of liberalism there can
be no talk about justice, because it stresses that each man must take care of
himself, his property and is responsible for nothing else. Personal interest
must be laid over the social interest (…).
It is a consequence of the philosophic teachings that proclaim to be
modern, in an era that places man as master and norm of everything. Man had become free from God and from all
values. (…) \For that reason, Adam Smith formulated
the law of economy: the economy had autonomy and is independent and free of
state law and the law of God…" In this way the difference between fascism and
liberalism exists simply in the fact that fascism conquers and spreads the
imperia in the name of the state and liberalism camouflages the same aims in
the name of democracy. It is essential
to keep sight of the fact that Bošković did not mention General Francisco
Franco, who did not make war in the name of the new philosophies but in the
name of the Church and against Freemasonry and Communism.
Croats may conclude with pleasure that their tradition of
political parties was always founded by the father of Croatia, Dr. Ante
Starčević who developed his state philosophy on the grounds of Croatian state
law and Christian morality (slogan: God and Croats). There, Croatian political philosophy never grew out of any
foreign philosophy i.e. out of the philosophy of Croatian enemies (who de facto
also want us to be fascists).
The Croatian Region of Istra:
The Roots of Regionalism
"The Journal for Social Research" No 6-7/1993, published by the Institute
for Social Research of Zagreb University, gave a very profound analysis on
the Croatian Istra region under the title "Istra: Particularity and the
General Croatian Context". The
review includes 14 papers that try, more or less scientifically to define
Istra.
In
the Introduction, historian Miroslav Bertoša, talks about "the mosaic of broken
social being…" and on page 594, Nevio Šetić, scientist from the city Pula's Institute for History, describes
the national integration of Istra and Kvarner Isles as a fight for human
rights. Croats (the majority of
inhabitants) fought for their right to equality (with Austrians and earlier
with Venetians/Italians who governed the North-West coastal Croatian
region). The local Croatian Party of
Right movement accepted the ideology of the existence of the Slavic people because the Croats (60%) needed the Slovenian
minority (26%) to fight against foreign domination. These circumstances
dictated an imbuing of national ideology by Starčević with the impact and a combination of the pan-Slavic ideology of
Strossmayer. From the earliest times (middle ages) the
Croats of Istra had a strong cultural i.e. national identity, but separate
interests of Italian and new ideologies (liberalism, brought through Italians
and Garibaldi revolution) created a new ideological relativity. The potentially main ideologist of a new regional party,
Istra Democratic Party, Fulvio Suran (also a representative of the "Centre
for Historic Research") defines national feeling and consciousness as a sort of
atavism, a reflex, and not as a consciousness of cultural belonging. He tries to create a new Istrian
nationality, because he understands any nationality in a relativistic way "… as a willingness that the given objects or
phenomenon get a determined sense…" (p. 770).
His theory of willingness conjures up the possibility that Istrianhood
becomes a nation, because for Suran, nationality is founded on fiction, not by
creative forces, unknown to his theory. Suran explicitly says that "…. the truth of a given (national) identity in an
area of ethnic plurality, like Istra, depends on its political 'strength', and
the strongest of these is the political interpretation which
is, without any
reason, the only
possible theory of the given reality…". Spiritually, Suran's theory is the closest
relation to the liberal and leftist Marxist theories of Herbert Marcuse
(a leading representative of the American school of psychological war) from the
"Frankfurt School" and it defines his intellectual attitude and
background. Marcuse refused any unique
culture (a national culture!) and recommended the atomisation of society with
initiatives given to large groups (Essay on Liberalisation, The End of Utopia).
Stipan Trogrlich can find a further reason for the theoretic relativism of
nationality in Istra in a paper "Istra between Clericalism and
Liberalism". He explains that until
1912, Istra ideologically had fought clerically and liberally oriented groups
of teachers, i.e. the intelligence that respected the
Church and tradition and the intelligence which was liberally (= Masonic) oriented, anti-traditional and
national. Liberal groups won the battle
and got the predominant influence. This
is the answer to why it is possible in Istra to have such impossible theories
on nationhood. There, the "cosmopolite" ideology of national enemies has won
the first historic battle against Christian traditionalism. We must yet face, and win, the second battle for a strong national
identity.
A book on Tudjman:
provocation or truth?
In the year 2000, right wing extremist Mladen
Schwartz (b.1947, Croatian Jew who lived with his parents in the Serbian
capital Belgrade) published a book, in Zagreb, entitled "Croatia after Tudjman":
A Study on National Fate, part of a planned "Collected works by M. Schwartz". There are certain aspects of
the work, which render it unacceptable to the future integrity and truthful
development of Croatian ideology.
Schwartz,
in his clever analysis of the period 1941 - 1945, stresses "the principles of
the Croatian Uprising Movement (Ustasha Movement) did not reveal any typically
fascist characteristics. If anything, it incorporated liberal and Marxist
values (The fruit of any value is revealed in the action taken, article 14,
"Hrvatsko pravo", 1993, No. 15/16) …" Then surprisingly, on page 455, he
declares: " In this time of the progressive global process towards the
annihilation of free nations (…) it is almost considered honorable to be a fascist…"
Conclusions of this nature could place Schwartz under a mantle of suspicion:
who is he, actually? Croatian
nationalists do not agree with colonial world globalism, but we are not
fascists - we never were.
Furthermore, in Chapter 16, "Memoirs on my acquaintance
with Tudjman", Schwartz recounts Tudjman's meeting with Croats in Hamburg,
Germany in what appears to be a very contradictory way: "On the 6th
of May 1989 we (Croatian cultural communion in Hamburg) assembled in a
Freemasonic lodge (…)(Tudjman) announced the publishing of his book:
"Trackless region of the Croatian reality" and a party journal "Voice of
Croatian Democratic Union". He then
praised General Francisco Franco, who had erected a common monument to all
victims of the Spanish civil war…" Now, if we accept that Franco was a Roman
Catholic General, and prosecutor of Freemasonry, which stood beside Spanish
communism and liberalism, would it not be a bit incongruous to have Tudjman
praise him in a Freemasonic lodge?
At this point we must pose some
questions about Mladen Schwartz's ideological identity:
1. What is his aim? If he did not tell the truth, what purpose
did he have in presenting untrue facts?
In his book, he attacks global Freemasonry, yet contrary to this he connects
Croatian nationalism with cosmopolitan Freemasonry. How could Tudjman praise
General Franco, who prosecuted Freemasonry (Croatian leader Pavelic in the
period 1941-1945 did not even do that), in a Freemasonic lodge? Franco was the only right wing politician
without any political or ideological connection to Freemasonry: he was a real
representative of the Roman Catholic Church and not an ideological fascist. In
present-day atheistic Europe it is no longer popular to be a Catholic
Francophile: yet he was the very opposite to Hitler who propagated a
neopaganism, very close to Freemasonry.
2. If the occasion described by
Swartz actually happened, we should ask ourselves: did Freemasonry stimulate
Croats in the direction of political renewal, only to control them later on the
grounds of political collaboration? If so, did Freemasonry have tacit
agreement, on these grounds, to work against the state through the media, in
the name of free press and democracy for their own "international purpose"?
3. Did there exist, in the enslaved
Croatia, an underground resistance of so-called Croatian Freemasons, who
resisted Serbian central power because they wanted to balance power among the
Freemasonic brothers in some future Confederate of Yugoslavia?
Chapter 12 of Swartz's book "Coup d'etat: from the
left or from the right?" is highly controversial. When he suggests the need
for a coup d'etat to break the humiliations, prosecutions and lawless behavior
of the "international community" towards Croatia, he observes that such a
"rebellion could not be successful (…) without consultations with partners outside
the country…" (p. 383) How can we talk about outside 'partners,' if the whole
world is in the hands of "the centers of the Jewish-Freemasonic
internationals"(p. 259) who work against Croatia, as described by Schwartz (a
Croatian Jew!)?
In view of the above, I can only
conclude that Mr. Schwarz must be a very interesting person. Some further
conclusions can be found in the unabridged version of my book.
Croatia in Christ
